Claap vs Avoma
A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and value to help you choose.
Claap
AI call recording, notes & async video
Free plan
Free plan; paid from ~€24/seat/mo, multilingual
Avoma
AI meeting assistant + conversation intelligence
Free plan
Free plan; paid from ~$19/seat/mo, conversation intel higher up
At a glance
| Spec | Claap | Avoma |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Budget-friendly |
| Complexity | Beginner-friendly | Beginner-friendly |
| Primary category | Conversation Intelligence | Conversation Intelligence |
| Integrations | 25+ | 40+ |
| Founded | 2021 | 2017 |
Feature comparison
Claap offers 9 of 11 tracked conversation intelligence features; Avoma offers 10.
| Feature | Claap | Avoma |
|---|---|---|
| Call & meeting recording | ||
| Transcription | ||
| AI summaries & notes | ||
| Talk-time & topic analytics | ||
| Deal & pipeline intelligence | ||
| Coaching & scorecards | ||
| Auto CRM sync | ||
| Multi-language support | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Claap
Pros
- AI call recording, transcription, and summaries
- CRM auto-fill and follow-up generation
- Async video for sharing deal context
Cons
- Lighter deal intelligence than Gong
- Younger product
- Best as a notetaker plus collaboration
Avoma
Pros
- Notes, transcription, and conversation intel in one
- Affordable tiers with a free plan
- Scheduling and agenda templates included
Cons
- Deal intelligence lighter than Gong
- Feature breadth can feel busy
- Best value on mid tiers
The verdict
The right pick depends on your priorities. Choose Claap if you value european sales teams that want call recording, ai notes, and async video in one. Choose Avoma if you need smb and mid-market teams that want notes plus conversation intelligence affordably.
Browse all tools →