Claap vs Jiminny
A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and value to help you choose.
Claap
AI call recording, notes & async video
Free plan
Free plan; paid from ~€24/seat/mo, multilingual
Jiminny
Conversation intelligence & coaching
Custom pricing
Custom per-seat pricing; coaching-focused
At a glance
| Spec | Claap | Jiminny |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free plan | Custom pricing |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Mid-range |
| Complexity | Beginner-friendly | Beginner-friendly |
| Primary category | Conversation Intelligence | Conversation Intelligence |
| Integrations | 25+ | 40+ |
| Founded | 2021 | 2016 |
Feature comparison
Claap offers 9 of 11 tracked conversation intelligence features; Jiminny offers 10.
| Feature | Claap | Jiminny |
|---|---|---|
| Call & meeting recording | ||
| Transcription | ||
| AI summaries & notes | ||
| Talk-time & topic analytics | ||
| Deal & pipeline intelligence | ||
| Coaching & scorecards | ||
| Auto CRM sync | ||
| Multi-language support | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Claap
Pros
- AI call recording, transcription, and summaries
- CRM auto-fill and follow-up generation
- Async video for sharing deal context
Cons
- Lighter deal intelligence than Gong
- Younger product
- Best as a notetaker plus collaboration
Jiminny
Pros
- Strong coaching and scorecard workflows
- Friendlier pricing than Gong
- Good CRM sync and analytics
Cons
- Smaller ecosystem than Gong
- Custom pricing, no self-serve
- Less deal-forecasting depth
The verdict
The right pick depends on your priorities. Choose Claap if you value european sales teams that want call recording, ai notes, and async video in one. Choose Jiminny if you need mid-market revenue teams focused on coaching and call review.
Browse all tools →