Clay vs Evaboot
Short version: Clay is the better fit for revOps and growth teams building bespoke, signal-based outbound at scale, while Evaboot is built for reps who build lists in Sales Navigator and need clean, enriched exports.
Clay
Waterfall enrichment + AI research in a spreadsheet
$167/mo
Free plan; paid from ~$167/mo billed annually, credit-based
Evaboot
Export & clean Sales Navigator lists
$9/mo
From ~$9/mo by credits; export + enrich Sales Navigator
At a glance
| Spec | Clay | Evaboot |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $167/mo | $9/mo |
| Budget tier | Mid-range | Budget-friendly |
| Complexity | Advanced | Beginner-friendly |
| Primary category | Sales Intelligence & Signals | Prospecting & Lead Data |
| Integrations | 120+ | 12+ |
| Founded | 2017 | 2020 |
Feature comparison
Clay offers 3 of 10 tracked prospecting & lead data features; Evaboot offers 6.
| Feature | Clay | Evaboot |
|---|---|---|
| Email finder | ||
| Mobile / direct dials | ||
| Email verification | ||
| Bulk enrichment | ||
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ||
| Intent data | ||
| 1-click CRM export | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Clay
Pros
- Waterfall enrichment across 100+ providers
- AI research agents automate account research
- Endlessly composable GTM data tool
Cons
- Steep learning curve
- Credit consumption is hard to predict
- You assemble the workflow yourself
Evaboot
Pros
- One-click Sales Navigator list export
- Cleans and filters out false-positive matches
- Finds and verifies emails on export
Cons
- Depends on a Sales Navigator subscription
- Export-focused, not a live database
- Credit-based pricing at volume
Which should you choose?
Choose Clay if…
- you want waterfall enrichment across 100+ providers
- you want AI research agents automate account research
- you want endlessly composable GTM data tool
Choose Evaboot if…
- you want one-click Sales Navigator list export
- you want cleans and filters out false-positive matches
- you want finds and verifies emails on export
The verdict
Both are solid prospecting & lead data tools. The best choice comes down to fit: Clay for revOps and growth teams building bespoke, signal-based outbound at scale, and Evaboot for reps who build lists in Sales Navigator and need clean, enriched exports.
Browse all tools →Frequently asked questions
Is Clay or Evaboot cheaper?
Evaboot is the more affordable option ($9/mo versus $167/mo). The lower sticker price isn't always the better value, though, weigh the tier your team will actually land on and any add-ons.
Which is better, Clay or Evaboot?
Neither is strictly better, they're built for different priorities. Clay is the stronger pick for revOps and growth teams building bespoke, signal-based outbound at scale, while Evaboot suits reps who build lists in Sales Navigator and need clean, enriched exports.
What's the main difference between Clay and Evaboot?
Clay is advanced and mid-range, while Evaboot is beginner-friendly and budget-friendly. On tracked prospecting & lead data features, Clay covers 3 and Evaboot covers 6.