Common Room vs FullEnrich
A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and value to help you choose.
Common Room
Capture buying signals across the web
Free plan
Free plan; paid custom; signal capture across many sources
FullEnrich
Waterfall enrichment across 15+ vendors
$29/mo
From ~$29/mo by credits; waterfall email + mobile enrichment
At a glance
| Spec | Common | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free plan | $29/mo |
| Budget tier | Mid-range | Budget-friendly |
| Complexity | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| Primary category | Sales Intelligence & Signals | Prospecting & Lead Data |
| Integrations | 50+ | 20+ |
| Founded | 2020 | 2023 |
Feature comparison
Common offers 9 of 11 tracked sales intelligence & signals features; FullEnrich offers 1.
| Feature | Common | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer intent data | ||
| Account & company research | ||
| Waterfall data enrichment | ||
| Job-change & hiring signals | ||
| ICP / lead scoring | ||
| Workflow automation | ||
| AI research agents | ||
| CRM enrichment | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Common Room
Pros
- Aggregates many signal sources into one view
- Identifies warm people and accounts
- Automations to route signals to reps
Cons
- Setup and signal tuning take effort
- Custom pricing at scale
- Best for signal-led motions
FullEnrich
Pros
- Waterfall across 15+ providers maximizes coverage
- Strong mobile-number find rates
- API-first, fits automated GTM stacks
Cons
- Enrichment only, no prospecting search
- Credit consumption can be hard to predict
- Younger product
The verdict
The right pick depends on your priorities. Choose Common if you value product-led and modern gtm teams acting on real-time buying signals. Choose FullEnrich if you need growth and revops teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact.
Browse all tools →