Common Room vs Gong
A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and value to help you choose.
Common Room
Capture buying signals across the web
Free plan
Free plan; paid custom; signal capture across many sources
Gong
Revenue intelligence from every call
Custom pricing
Custom annual pricing: platform fee + ~per-seat; enterprise-leaning
At a glance
| Spec | Common | Gong |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free plan | Custom pricing |
| Budget tier | Mid-range | Premium |
| Complexity | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| Primary category | Sales Intelligence & Signals | Conversation Intelligence |
| Integrations | 50+ | 100+ |
| Founded | 2020 | 2015 |
Feature comparison
Common offers 9 of 11 tracked sales intelligence & signals features; Gong offers 2.
| Feature | Common | Gong |
|---|---|---|
| Buyer intent data | ||
| Account & company research | ||
| Waterfall data enrichment | ||
| Job-change & hiring signals | ||
| ICP / lead scoring | ||
| Workflow automation | ||
| AI research agents | ||
| CRM enrichment | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Common Room
Pros
- Aggregates many signal sources into one view
- Identifies warm people and accounts
- Automations to route signals to reps
Cons
- Setup and signal tuning take effort
- Custom pricing at scale
- Best for signal-led motions
Gong
Pros
- Best-in-class call analytics and deal-risk signals
- Powerful coaching, scorecards, and trackers
- Strong forecasting and pipeline intelligence
Cons
- Premium pricing with platform fees
- More than small teams need
- Adoption takes real change management
The verdict
The right pick depends on your priorities. Choose Common if you value product-led and modern gtm teams acting on real-time buying signals. Choose Gong if you need revenue teams that want deal risk and coaching insight at scale.
Browse all tools →