Datagma vs FullEnrich
Short version: Datagma is the better fit for automation-driven teams that want enrichment plus job-change signals via API, while FullEnrich is built for growth and RevOps teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact.
Datagma
Enrichment & job-change tracking API
$39/mo
From ~$39/mo by credits; enrichment + job-change alerts
FullEnrich
Waterfall enrichment across 15+ vendors
$29/mo
From ~$29/mo by credits; waterfall email + mobile enrichment
At a glance
| Spec | Datagma | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $39/mo | $29/mo |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Budget-friendly |
| Complexity | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| Primary category | Prospecting & Lead Data | Prospecting & Lead Data |
| Integrations | 18+ | 20+ |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
Feature comparison
Datagma offers 6 of 10 tracked prospecting & lead data features; FullEnrich offers 6.
| Feature | Datagma | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Email finder | ||
| Mobile / direct dials | ||
| Email verification | ||
| Bulk enrichment | ||
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ||
| Intent data | ||
| 1-click CRM export | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Datagma
Pros
- Email + phone enrichment via a clean API
- Job-change tracking for warm timing
- Affordable for automated workflows
Cons
- API-first, lighter UI
- Smaller brand and ecosystem
- Credit-based at scale
FullEnrich
Pros
- Waterfall across 15+ providers maximizes coverage
- Strong mobile-number find rates
- API-first, fits automated GTM stacks
Cons
- Enrichment only, no prospecting search
- Credit consumption can be hard to predict
- Younger product
Which should you choose?
Choose Datagma if…
- you want email + phone enrichment via a clean API
- you want job-change tracking for warm timing
- you want affordable for automated workflows
Choose FullEnrich if…
- you want waterfall across 15+ providers maximizes coverage
- you want strong mobile-number find rates
- you want API-first, fits automated GTM stacks
The verdict
Both are solid prospecting & lead data tools. The best choice comes down to fit: Datagma for automation-driven teams that want enrichment plus job-change signals via API, and FullEnrich for growth and RevOps teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact.
Browse all tools →Frequently asked questions
Is Datagma or FullEnrich cheaper?
FullEnrich is the more affordable option ($29/mo versus $39/mo). The lower sticker price isn't always the better value, though, weigh the tier your team will actually land on and any add-ons.
Which is better, Datagma or FullEnrich?
Neither is strictly better, they're built for different priorities. Datagma is the stronger pick for automation-driven teams that want enrichment plus job-change signals via API, while FullEnrich suits growth and RevOps teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact.
What's the main difference between Datagma and FullEnrich?
Datagma is intermediate and budget-friendly, while FullEnrich is intermediate and budget-friendly. On tracked prospecting & lead data features, Datagma covers 6 and FullEnrich covers 6.