Datagma vs FullEnrich
A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and value to help you choose.
Datagma
Enrichment & job-change tracking API
$39/mo
From ~$39/mo by credits; enrichment + job-change alerts
FullEnrich
Waterfall enrichment across 15+ vendors
$29/mo
From ~$29/mo by credits; waterfall email + mobile enrichment
At a glance
| Spec | Datagma | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $39/mo | $29/mo |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Budget-friendly |
| Complexity | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| Primary category | Prospecting & Lead Data | Prospecting & Lead Data |
| Integrations | 18+ | 20+ |
| Founded | 2021 | 2023 |
Feature comparison
Datagma offers 6 of 10 tracked prospecting & lead data features; FullEnrich offers 6.
| Feature | Datagma | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Email finder | ||
| Mobile / direct dials | ||
| Email verification | ||
| Bulk enrichment | ||
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ||
| Intent data | ||
| 1-click CRM export | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Datagma
Pros
- Email + phone enrichment via a clean API
- Job-change tracking for warm timing
- Affordable for automated workflows
Cons
- API-first, lighter UI
- Smaller brand and ecosystem
- Credit-based at scale
FullEnrich
Pros
- Waterfall across 15+ providers maximizes coverage
- Strong mobile-number find rates
- API-first, fits automated GTM stacks
Cons
- Enrichment only, no prospecting search
- Credit consumption can be hard to predict
- Younger product
The verdict
The right pick depends on your priorities. Choose Datagma if you value automation-driven teams that want enrichment plus job-change signals via api. Choose FullEnrich if you need growth and revops teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact.
Browse all tools →