FullEnrich vs Datagma
Short version: FullEnrich is the better fit for growth and RevOps teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact, while Datagma is built for automation-driven teams that want enrichment plus job-change signals via API.
FullEnrich
Waterfall enrichment across 15+ vendors
$29/mo
From ~$29/mo by credits; waterfall email + mobile enrichment
Datagma
Enrichment & job-change tracking API
$39/mo
From ~$39/mo by credits; enrichment + job-change alerts
At a glance
| Spec | FullEnrich | Datagma |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29/mo | $39/mo |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Budget-friendly |
| Complexity | Intermediate | Intermediate |
| Primary category | Prospecting & Lead Data | Prospecting & Lead Data |
| Integrations | 20+ | 18+ |
| Founded | 2023 | 2021 |
Feature comparison
FullEnrich offers 6 of 10 tracked prospecting & lead data features; Datagma offers 6.
| Feature | FullEnrich | Datagma |
|---|---|---|
| Email finder | ||
| Mobile / direct dials | ||
| Email verification | ||
| Bulk enrichment | ||
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ||
| Intent data | ||
| 1-click CRM export | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
FullEnrich
Pros
- Waterfall across 15+ providers maximizes coverage
- Strong mobile-number find rates
- API-first, fits automated GTM stacks
Cons
- Enrichment only, no prospecting search
- Credit consumption can be hard to predict
- Younger product
Datagma
Pros
- Email + phone enrichment via a clean API
- Job-change tracking for warm timing
- Affordable for automated workflows
Cons
- API-first, lighter UI
- Smaller brand and ecosystem
- Credit-based at scale
Which should you choose?
Choose FullEnrich if…
- you want waterfall across 15+ providers maximizes coverage
- you want strong mobile-number find rates
- you want API-first, fits automated GTM stacks
Choose Datagma if…
- you want email + phone enrichment via a clean API
- you want job-change tracking for warm timing
- you want affordable for automated workflows
The verdict
Both are solid prospecting & lead data tools. The best choice comes down to fit: FullEnrich for growth and RevOps teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact, and Datagma for automation-driven teams that want enrichment plus job-change signals via API.
Browse all tools →Frequently asked questions
Is FullEnrich or Datagma cheaper?
FullEnrich is the more affordable option ($29/mo versus $39/mo). The lower sticker price isn't always the better value, though, weigh the tier your team will actually land on and any add-ons.
Which is better, FullEnrich or Datagma?
Neither is strictly better, they're built for different priorities. FullEnrich is the stronger pick for growth and RevOps teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact, while Datagma suits automation-driven teams that want enrichment plus job-change signals via API.
What's the main difference between FullEnrich and Datagma?
FullEnrich is intermediate and budget-friendly, while Datagma is intermediate and budget-friendly. On tracked prospecting & lead data features, FullEnrich covers 6 and Datagma covers 6.