FullEnrich vs Lusha
Short version: FullEnrich is the better fit for growth and RevOps teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact, while Lusha is built for individual reps and small teams that want quick contact lookups.
FullEnrich
Waterfall enrichment across 15+ vendors
$29/mo
From ~$29/mo by credits; waterfall email + mobile enrichment
Lusha
Quick B2B contact lookups
Free plan
Free plan with limited credits; paid from ~$37/mo
At a glance
| Spec | FullEnrich | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $29/mo | Free plan |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Budget-friendly |
| Complexity | Intermediate | Beginner-friendly |
| Primary category | Prospecting & Lead Data | Prospecting & Lead Data |
| Integrations | 20+ | 30+ |
| Founded | 2023 | 2016 |
Feature comparison
FullEnrich offers 6 of 10 tracked prospecting & lead data features; Lusha offers 9.
| Feature | FullEnrich | Lusha |
|---|---|---|
| Email finder | ||
| Mobile / direct dials | ||
| Email verification | ||
| Bulk enrichment | ||
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ||
| Intent data | ||
| 1-click CRM export | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
FullEnrich
Pros
- Waterfall across 15+ providers maximizes coverage
- Strong mobile-number find rates
- API-first, fits automated GTM stacks
Cons
- Enrichment only, no prospecting search
- Credit consumption can be hard to predict
- Younger product
Lusha
Pros
- Simple, fast browser extension
- Good direct-dial coverage
- Usable free plan
Cons
- Credit limits on lower tiers
- Accuracy varies by region
- Lighter on bulk workflows
Which should you choose?
Choose FullEnrich if…
- you want waterfall across 15+ providers maximizes coverage
- you want strong mobile-number find rates
- you want API-first, fits automated GTM stacks
Choose Lusha if…
- you want simple, fast browser extension
- you want good direct-dial coverage
- you want usable free plan
The verdict
Both are solid prospecting & lead data tools. The best choice comes down to fit: FullEnrich for growth and RevOps teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact, and Lusha for individual reps and small teams that want quick contact lookups.
Browse all tools →Frequently asked questions
Is FullEnrich or Lusha cheaper?
Lusha is the more affordable option (Free plan versus $29/mo). The lower sticker price isn't always the better value, though, weigh the tier your team will actually land on and any add-ons.
Which is better, FullEnrich or Lusha?
Neither is strictly better, they're built for different priorities. FullEnrich is the stronger pick for growth and RevOps teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact, while Lusha suits individual reps and small teams that want quick contact lookups.
What's the main difference between FullEnrich and Lusha?
FullEnrich is intermediate and budget-friendly, while Lusha is beginner-friendly and budget-friendly. On tracked prospecting & lead data features, FullEnrich covers 6 and Lusha covers 9.