lemlist vs FullEnrich
Short version: lemlist is the better fit for agencies, founders, and SMB teams running personalized cold outbound, while FullEnrich is built for growth and RevOps teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact. lemlist is worth a close look for multichannel sequences with built-in deliverability warm-up at an SMB price.
lemlist
Cold email + multichannel for small teams
$55/mo
Free trial; paid from ~$55/seat/mo annual, lead database add-on
FullEnrich
Waterfall enrichment across 15+ vendors
$29/mo
From ~$29/mo by credits; waterfall email + mobile enrichment
At a glance
| Spec | lemlist | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | $55/mo | $29/mo |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Budget-friendly |
| Complexity | Beginner-friendly | Intermediate |
| Primary category | Sales Engagement | Prospecting & Lead Data |
| Integrations | 40+ | 20+ |
| Founded | 2018 | 2023 |
Feature comparison
lemlist offers 1 of 10 tracked prospecting & lead data features; FullEnrich offers 6.
| Feature | lemlist | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Email finder | ||
| Mobile / direct dials | ||
| Email verification | ||
| Bulk enrichment | ||
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ||
| Intent data | ||
| 1-click CRM export | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
lemlist
Pros
- Standout personalization (images, video, liquid variables)
- Built-in lead database + lemwarm deliverability
- Affordable and quick to launch
Cons
- Lighter analytics and admin than enterprise tools
- Database coverage trails dedicated vendors
- Scales less gracefully for large orgs
FullEnrich
Pros
- Waterfall across 15+ providers maximizes coverage
- Strong mobile-number find rates
- API-first, fits automated GTM stacks
Cons
- Enrichment only, no prospecting search
- Credit consumption can be hard to predict
- Younger product
Which should you choose?
Choose lemlist if…
- you want standout personalization (images, video, liquid variables)
- you want built-in lead database + lemwarm deliverability
- you want affordable and quick to launch
Choose FullEnrich if…
- you want waterfall across 15+ providers maximizes coverage
- you want strong mobile-number find rates
- you want API-first, fits automated GTM stacks
The verdict
Both are solid prospecting & lead data tools. lemlist stands out for multichannel sequences with built-in deliverability warm-up at an SMB price, but the best choice comes down to fit: lemlist for agencies, founders, and SMB teams running personalized cold outbound, and FullEnrich for growth and RevOps teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact.
Browse all tools →Frequently asked questions
Is lemlist or FullEnrich cheaper?
FullEnrich is the more affordable option ($29/mo versus $55/mo). The lower sticker price isn't always the better value, though, weigh the tier your team will actually land on and any add-ons.
Which is better, lemlist or FullEnrich?
Neither is strictly better, they're built for different priorities. lemlist is the stronger pick for agencies, founders, and SMB teams running personalized cold outbound, while FullEnrich suits growth and RevOps teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact. lemlist also stands out for multichannel sequences with built-in deliverability warm-up at an SMB price.
What's the main difference between lemlist and FullEnrich?
lemlist is beginner-friendly and budget-friendly, while FullEnrich is intermediate and budget-friendly. On tracked prospecting & lead data features, lemlist covers 1 and FullEnrich covers 6.