Lusha vs FullEnrich
Short version: Lusha is the better fit for individual reps and small teams that want quick contact lookups, while FullEnrich is built for growth and RevOps teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact.
Lusha
Quick B2B contact lookups
Free plan
Free plan with limited credits; paid from ~$37/mo
FullEnrich
Waterfall enrichment across 15+ vendors
$29/mo
From ~$29/mo by credits; waterfall email + mobile enrichment
At a glance
| Spec | Lusha | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free plan | $29/mo |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Budget-friendly |
| Complexity | Beginner-friendly | Intermediate |
| Primary category | Prospecting & Lead Data | Prospecting & Lead Data |
| Integrations | 30+ | 20+ |
| Founded | 2016 | 2023 |
Feature comparison
Lusha offers 9 of 10 tracked prospecting & lead data features; FullEnrich offers 6.
| Feature | Lusha | FullEnrich |
|---|---|---|
| Email finder | ||
| Mobile / direct dials | ||
| Email verification | ||
| Bulk enrichment | ||
| LinkedIn / Chrome extension | ||
| Intent data | ||
| 1-click CRM export | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Lusha
Pros
- Simple, fast browser extension
- Good direct-dial coverage
- Usable free plan
Cons
- Credit limits on lower tiers
- Accuracy varies by region
- Lighter on bulk workflows
FullEnrich
Pros
- Waterfall across 15+ providers maximizes coverage
- Strong mobile-number find rates
- API-first, fits automated GTM stacks
Cons
- Enrichment only, no prospecting search
- Credit consumption can be hard to predict
- Younger product
Which should you choose?
Choose Lusha if…
- you want simple, fast browser extension
- you want good direct-dial coverage
- you want usable free plan
Choose FullEnrich if…
- you want waterfall across 15+ providers maximizes coverage
- you want strong mobile-number find rates
- you want API-first, fits automated GTM stacks
The verdict
Both are solid prospecting & lead data tools. The best choice comes down to fit: Lusha for individual reps and small teams that want quick contact lookups, and FullEnrich for growth and RevOps teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact.
Browse all tools →Frequently asked questions
Is Lusha or FullEnrich cheaper?
Lusha is the more affordable option (Free plan versus $29/mo). The lower sticker price isn't always the better value, though, weigh the tier your team will actually land on and any add-ons.
Which is better, Lusha or FullEnrich?
Neither is strictly better, they're built for different priorities. Lusha is the stronger pick for individual reps and small teams that want quick contact lookups, while FullEnrich suits growth and RevOps teams that want the highest enrichment hit rate per contact.
What's the main difference between Lusha and FullEnrich?
Lusha is beginner-friendly and budget-friendly, while FullEnrich is intermediate and budget-friendly. On tracked prospecting & lead data features, Lusha covers 9 and FullEnrich covers 6.