Otter.ai vs Avoma
A side-by-side comparison of features, pricing, and value to help you choose.
Otter.ai
Popular AI transcription & meeting notes
Free plan
Free plan; paid from ~$17/seat/mo
Avoma
AI meeting assistant + conversation intelligence
Free plan
Free plan; paid from ~$19/seat/mo, conversation intel higher up
At a glance
| Spec | Otter.ai | Avoma |
|---|---|---|
| Starting price | Free plan | Free plan |
| Budget tier | Budget-friendly | Budget-friendly |
| Complexity | Beginner-friendly | Beginner-friendly |
| Primary category | Conversation Intelligence | Conversation Intelligence |
| Integrations | 20+ | 40+ |
| Founded | 2016 | 2017 |
Feature comparison
Otter.ai offers 6 of 11 tracked conversation intelligence features; Avoma offers 10.
| Feature | Otter.ai | Avoma |
|---|---|---|
| Call & meeting recording | ||
| Transcription | ||
| AI summaries & notes | ||
| Talk-time & topic analytics | ||
| Deal & pipeline intelligence | ||
| Coaching & scorecards | ||
| Auto CRM sync | ||
| Multi-language support | ||
| Free plan | ||
| API & webhooks | ||
| Priority / 24-7 support |
Otter.ai
Pros
- Accurate live transcription and captions
- Generous free plan
- Simple and broadly compatible
Cons
- Not sales-specific (no deal intelligence)
- Limited coaching/analytics
- English-centric
Avoma
Pros
- Notes, transcription, and conversation intel in one
- Affordable tiers with a free plan
- Scheduling and agenda templates included
Cons
- Deal intelligence lighter than Gong
- Feature breadth can feel busy
- Best value on mid tiers
The verdict
The right pick depends on your priorities. Choose Otter.ai if you value anyone who wants cheap, reliable meeting transcription and notes. Choose Avoma if you need smb and mid-market teams that want notes plus conversation intelligence affordably.
Browse all tools →